Anarchy and the Alt-Right Are Not “Two Sides of Anti-Government” by RebelZva & CaptXBonnot ♱ 2026

People keep trying to mash us together because we both say “fuck the state.” Stop. They’re not the same. Not even close. Here’s why, straight from the mouths that matter.

Anarchism demands the end of all involuntary hierarchy. “Anarchy is the mother of order, not its daughter,” Proudhon wrote back when people still thought kings were divine. Bakunin doubled down: “I bow before no authority, no matter how divine or human.” The goal is no masters, no cages, no one standing on anyone else’s neck.

The alt-right? They just want a different boot. Richard Spencer laid it bare: “We need a state that is strong enough to enforce a racial hierarchy… hierarchy is inevitable and good.” Jared Taylor keeps it even simpler: “A society without hierarchy is a society without standards.” They’re not dismantling power—they’re auditioning to run it with a skin-color filter and a prayer book.

On race it’s night and day. Anarchism has always been anti-racist at its core. Lorenzo Kom’boa Ervin put it plain: “The revolution that fails to abolish white supremacy is no revolution at all.” Meanwhile the alt-right builds its entire identity around it. Identity Evropa’s leaked manifesto bragged they were “the vanguard of white identity.” Nick Fuentes sells merch screaming “stop the replacement.” That’s not anti-government rebellion—that’s government-by-genetics with extra steps.

History proves we’ve never been on the same side. Anarchists and antifascists have been cracking fascist skulls since Cable Street in 1936, when ordinary people used bricks, bottles, and kitchen chairs to stop Oswald Mosley’s blackshirts from marching through London’s East End. Fast-forward and the same energy is still alive—Rose City Antifa shutting down Proud Boys rallies, John Brown Gun Clubs standing guard while liberals clutch pearls about “both sides.” The alt-right never fights the state without begging it for protection the second things get real.

The state itself tells the story clearest. Anarchists see it as the armed wing of private property and racial capitalism—Emma Goldman called it “the strongest weapon in the hands of the ruling class.” We want it gone because it protects the few at the expense of the many. The alt-right hates the state only when it won’t let them deport, ban, or “replace” people they don’t like. Same sentence, opposite conclusions.

Quick reality check: if your “anarchism” still craves patriarchy, ethnostates, enforced traditional gender roles backed by violence, or any kind of purity test—you’re not an anarchist. You’re a feudalist in a black hoodie with a Pepe pin.

We are not confused siblings. We are the fist and the face it meets. Always have been.

Sources so nobody can cry foul:

• Proudhon, What is Property? 1840

• Bakunin, God and the State 1871

• Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays 1910

• Lorenzo Kom’boa Ervin, Anarchism and the Black Revolution

• Richard Spencer, Vox interview Aug 2017

• Jared Taylor, AmRen speech 2022

• Identity Evropa manifesto leaks, Unicorn Riot 2018

• Cable Street accounts, Bishopsgate Institute archives

No masters. No cages. No apologies. See you in the streets, captain.

— RebelZva & CaptXBonnot 🖤🏴🔥

Leave a comment